Cook intent on reprising role as tourists' marathon man
Prolific run-scorer says England batsmen must be more cautious early in innings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.By the time Sachin Tendulkar was Alastair Cook's age he had obviously scored more Test match runs. One is a legend of the game wielding a bat that moves at the speed of light and the other is a former choirboy from Essex who sometimes makes his craft look less fluent than hewing for coal.
So when the glorious Tendulkar reached his 26th birthday he had made 5,177 runs for India including 18 hundreds. That total is 318 runs more than Cook's 4,859, which includes 15 hundreds. And nobody else comes close. Graeme Smith of South Africa was in his 28th year when he reached the number of runs that Cook has so far annexed, David Gower, the next Englishman, was in his 29th, Don Bradman in his 30th, Gary Sobers was 30.
Cook will be 26 on Christmas Day and he already seems to have been opening England's batting forever. He spent the first two matches of this Ashes series demonstrating his particular attributes. There is nothing fancy at all about his strokeplay. But he must have co-written the manual on playing within your limitations and his powers of concentration, in which every ball becomes a new contest, can make a flibbertigibbet of a chess grandmaster.
When he reached Brisbane doubts lingered about whether his lack of style, allied as it was to an undoubted substance, could carry it all for much longer. In the team at 21, his strengths and weaknesses still seemed to be the same nearly five years on. The spicy pitches at home last summer had suited no batsman, especially those charged with facing the new ball, and Cook's second innings 110 at the Oval in the third Test against Pakistan probably saved his career.
But doughty as it might have been, it was an unsatisfactory affair. He needed to do it against Australia. In two previous Ashes series his record had been pitiful. His limitations had been exposed (especially his tendency to push at the ball around where fourth stump might be) his strengths subdued (especially his cutting and clipping).
At the Gabba, Cook made 67 and 235 not out and at the Adelaide Oval another 148. Suddenly, he was a run machine. He dried up along with everybody else at Perth. Going along neatly in the first innings it was his dismissal for 32, a drive veering off the outside of the bat to gully that provoked the following collapse.
"I don't think you can say you'll score 450 runs in every two Tests you play," he said yesterday as the tourists arrived in Melbourne still licking wounds inflicted during the 267-run defeat in Perth that levelled the series. "But you can do it again, that's the beauty of batting. I didn't do it again but there is the chance to go to Melbourne and score some runs again. I feel in good nick."
Two such scores as he made in those opening Tests were a tribute to stamina. Together with Graham Gooch he had returned to the old verities: play how you know and never forget that when you are in, you must stay in. And when he was in, there was a new Cook, or at least an enhanced one, the one that plays down the ground as well as waiting for the short, wide balls to cut away through point or to tuck off the legs through square leg and midwicket.
Dropped twice in Brisbane, on 103 and 222, his was an innings of breathtaking calm. He hardly seemed to have broken sweat by its end and he had shared partnerships of 188 with his captain, Andrew Strauss, and of 329, unbroken, with Jonathan Trott.
He followed it up in Adelaide but like the rest of England's batsmen he mucked it up in Perth. "We had a good meeting after the game and tried to put a few issues to bed," he said. "I thought we bowled pretty well but if you are bowled out for 180 and 120 you are not going to win a Test.
"We have a little history of doing it, that's losing wickets quickly and that's an area we are desperately trying to improve on. First off we have to be very honest within the group as to what went wrong, there is no magic cure, the only way is individually: in those first few balls when you go in, they are the most dangerous especially if momentum is built up against you.
"We are very comfortable with each other and the environment Andy Flower and Andrew Strauss have created allows us to feel that and people feel they can speak their mind." Just as well. Some minds needed to be spoken post Perth.
The way things are going, Cook will end his career as easily England's leading run getter. This little fact will not be to all tastes, since immediately ahead of him in 20th place at present is Tom Graveney, who exuded class, and in front of him are men like Jack Hobbs, Denis Compton, Wally Hammond, David Gower and at the top of the tree, Gooch.
None of this should cut any ice. It was clear when Cook burst on to the scene that he had what it took, enough talent and a state of mind, perhaps honed by long hours of practice when he was in the St Paul's Cathedral choir, that made it possible for him to occupy the crease for hour upon hour.
There is a lot of nonsense being talked about the Melbourne pitch. It will be slower and less bouncy than Perth and that will be to Cook's liking. More likely to intimidate, you might think, is a crowd pushing 100,000.
"Everyone knows what the Boxing Day Test in Melbourne means," he said. "Back at home when I was younger you put the radio on to hear what was happening when England were involved, so it is going to be a great occasion. The crowd does not really bother me.
"What I do know is it is a great place to play cricket. There are a lot of days when you are at Chelmsford in the middle of April with three people watching and it is freezing cold or you can play at Melbourne in front of 100,000 – I think everyone knows where they would rather be."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments