Boycott insufferably right

James Lawton
Monday 06 August 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Geoff Boycott is not likely to win new friends with his assertion that what England need most of all now is, well, another Geoff Boycott.

How self-serving of him to rake up the fact that he and the late Ken Barrington were dropped for "scoring too slowly" back when England could stretch a Test match into five days. Recalls Boycott: "In 1967 at Leeds, England beat India by six wickets in the first Test. G Boycott made 246 not out in an England total of 550. I was dropped. The chairman of selectors, Doug Insole, had this crackpot idea that we should be playing 'brighter' cricket. It was not enough to be playing winning cricket and that the matches lasted five days."

So Boycott drones on, trotting out such old-hat theories that the job of a batsman is to occupy the crease, block the good balls and punish the bad ones. He really is insufferable. This is particularly so because whenever he expresses a view he is almost invariably right.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in