Board orders selectors to play Ontong

Brian McKenna
Wednesday 02 January 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

South Africa selector Graeme Pollock faces disciplinary action after clashing with the United Cricket Board over the Justin Ontong saga.

Pollock could be rapped after voicing his anger with the decision to play Ontong ahead of Jacques Rudolph in the third Test with Australia, which began in Sydney today.

Rudolph, who is white, was originally included in the team as Lance Klusener's replacement.

But UCB president Percy Sonn vetoed the side, and forced the selectors to give a debut to Ontong – who is black.

Pollock, whose nephew Shaun is South Africa captain, also faces censure after he apparently told reporters that Sonn had changed the side.

Sonn later confirmed he had intervened – a move which sparked a major outcry in South Africa and triggered an investigation by the Ministry of Sport.

Sonn told SABC News: "Graeme Pollock has got two choices. Either he complies with the decision and keeps his unhappiness to himself, or he will face the voracity of the UCB structures."

Pollock has publicly disagreed with Sonn's behaviour, hinting it was a political one.

He said: "I think Justin has good cricketing ability and that he has a future, but that doesn't mean that picking him for the Test team right now is the correct decision.

"I don't believe we always think carefully enough about the player himself. How does Justin feel about playing when he knows many of his friends think he's just playing for political reasons?

"Perhaps he's embarrassed about it all, knowing as he does that the rest of the team are aware of what's happening. In some ways, picking a player for political reasons can be seen as a slight on the guy himself."

Ontong got a pair against Australia leg–spinner Stuart MacGill in his only outing for the tourists against New South Wales before Michael Bevan smashed him for 35 runs in just two overs.

The Ministry of Sport confirmed they will contact Sonn, who is in Sydney, tomorrow.

Spokesman Graham Abrahams told PA International: "This is nothing new in South African sport.

"I am sure it is in line with the UCB policy but we will ask for an explanation from Mr Sonn tomorrow."

South Africa's Test squad has an official quota of one player of colour in the side, although unofficially it has been stretched to two in recent times.

This quota system has been severely criticised in the current series against Australia after Steve Waugh's side romped home in the first two Test matches.

Former South Africa players Adrian Kuiper, Pat Symcox and Steven Jack have all warned of serious consequences if the current policy is followed.

Kuiper said: "We say we want to compete with the best in the world but the structure of our cricket just won't allow that. We have got quota systems in the provincial set–up and now in the national team as well.

"If we are going to compete at international level, then firstly our domestic scene needs to be reorganised, then it must be carried through to the national side."

Symcox said: "We can't have our cake and eat it. We want to be the best team in the world and win the 2003 World Cup but we also have to appease political aspirations. The players end up getting caught in the middle."

Jack called on the UCB to clarify the quota issue, and added: "We hear one day that it's one player, and the next day we hear it's two. Now the team gets vetoed because 'a player of colour isn't there.'

"It isn't doing our cricket any good, and the sooner someone stands up and lays down the official policy properly the better."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in