Blow for ECB as counties reject league proposals

Angus Fraser
Tuesday 11 May 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

English cricket's most powerful committee, The First Class Forum, yesterday kicked out proposals for a combined four-day and one-day domestic competition and decided to form a review group of its own. The Interim Review Group, whose objective is to look at the future structure of first-class cricket, will be headed by the FCF chairman, Mike Soper, and will contain a larger representation from the counties - four or five county chairmen or chief executives - than the Domestic Structure Review Group, whose proposals have been thrown out.

English cricket's most powerful committee, The First Class Forum, yesterday kicked out proposals for a combined four-day and one-day domestic competition and decided to form a review group of its own. The Interim Review Group, whose objective is to look at the future structure of first-class cricket, will be headed by the FCF chairman, Mike Soper, and will contain a larger representation from the counties - four or five county chairmen or chief executives - than the Domestic Structure Review Group, whose proposals have been thrown out.

As well as reviewing the structure of first-class cricket the group will look into the development of Twenty20 cricket, the format of the National League, the extension of floodlit cricket and the number of teams promoted and relegated each season. The recommendations of the group, if authorised will come into effect in the 2006 season.

This decision will come as a major blow to the England and Wales Cricket Board who was hoping its recommendations would be adopted by the FCF, a committee which incorporates the 18 first-class counties and the Marylebone Cricket Club. But in recent times the counties have become discontent with the direction in which the ECB has been steering the game. They feel they have been ostracised and this decision will let the ECB know who is in charge.

At the same meeting in Loughborough, the FCF also allowed counties to continue employing two overseas players in 2005. There are many who feel there should be only one overseas player at each county and the 11-5 vote, with three absentees - which is very worrying - seems to be another example of the counties putting their own well-being ahead of that of the national team.

It is feared that these expensive overseas players, and the ever-increasing number of cricketers who can play here on European passports, even though they are not eligible for England, will eventually start to have a detrimental effect on the performance of the national side.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in