Cricket: Women's World Cup Final: Finale a survival of the fittest

Rob Steen
Friday 30 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WITHIN minutes of seeing off the Netherlands on Thursday, Karen Smithies and her colleagues were haring up the pavilion stairs at Ealing Cricket Club. Forget the showers. A session with the team psychologist took precedence.

It remains to be seen whether Steve Bull's theories on body language, self-assurance and visualisation can achieve their ultimate goal, namely victory over New Zealand in tomorrow's Women's World Cup final, but there can be no doubting their influence on the hosts' rendezvous at Lord's.

When the England squad first met Bull last October, only a couple of their number believed Australia could be beaten. Proof of the transformation was visible in the assertive way they overcame a loss to New Zealand to trounce Ireland, held the Indian batsmen at bay with 17 runs required off the last 17 balls then defeated the favourites 24 hours later with a superb display of outcricket that drew some of the sting simultaneously being suffered by the menfolk at Headingley. The amateurs, in effect, have outboxed the pros.

New Zealand, though, are still on their feet, and standing tall at that. Defeat against the Antipodean arch-enemy in their final round-robin fixture would almost certainly have meant elimination on an inferior run-rate yet Australia were brushed aside for 77 and the tournament's only unblemished record survived. Then again, one can hardly expect any less of a side led by an Illingworth.

Sarah Illingworth has at her disposal a rich vein of seamers and an array of fielders every bit as lethal as those in Smithies' corner. That much was made abundantly clear when the pair met at Beckenham, where England, chasing 128, sustained five run-outs and fell well short.

In Jan Brittin and Carole Hodges, England nonetheless boast the event's two most consistent batsmen. Jointly responsible for all four of the centuries scored during the qualifying section, they have so far helped construct four totals in excess of 200. A fascinating, if probably low-scoring, tussle is undoubtedly in store.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in