Cricket / Third Test: Faisalabad fires Pakistani ire: Henry Blofeld traces the roots of a long-running dispute
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHICKENS have always had a nasty habit of coming home to roost. I wonder if any of those who orchestrated and supported events from the England viewpoint in Faisalabad in 1987-88, when Mike Gatting and Shakoor Rana had their celebrated run-in, now feel it might have been better if they had reacted differently.
There can surely be little doubt that the Pakistanis came here this time expecting what they consider to be harsh treatment - their attitude has been clear - just as England were all too eagerly on the lookout for perceived injustice in 1987-88.
Aqib Javed and Javed Miandad would not have carried their treatment of Roy Palmer to such extremes if they had not felt that they had a point to make. Of course, their behaviour was wholly unacceptable but in the blatantly aggressive world in which we live, and considering the recent history of series between these two sides, it was understandable.
It has been said that Shakoor Rana was the inevitable stool pigeon after Pakistan's manager Haseeb Ahsan had been shown the door at Lord's when in 1987 he protested at the presence of David Constant on the panel of Test umpires, Constant and the Pakistanis having been at loggerheads here in 1982.
To say that two, let alone three wrongs make a right is a rotten philosophy. Look where it has got us and who is to say where it will all end - if ever it does. The Pakistanis will say that neutral umpires are the answer. They will claim that neutral incompetence is infinitely better than homegrown incompetence for it will not bring with it accusations of prejudice. But the Pakistanis still have to show how the considerable cost of neutral umpires can be covered, especially in the midst of recession.
In Pakistan, Gatting's outburst and his side's hostility to the umpiring was wholeheartedly supported by the management of Peter Lush and Micky Stewart. Later, Raman Subba Row, the chairman of the TCCB, flew in and also strongly took the side of the England players. On his return home he authorised the payment of an extra pounds 1,000 to each member of the party.
At the time the wisdom of this seemed doubtful, to say the least. It was the former Pakistan captain, Asif Iqbal, who put it into sharp perspective talking on television yesterday. 'The one thing I do know,' he said to Tony Lewis, 'is that the Pakistanis won't be given pounds 1,000 each when they return home'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments