Cricket / Sixth Test: Why bad luck always hounds the losers

Henry Blofeld
Monday 23 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ONE OF the main complaints of England sides in recent years has been that English umpires, in doing their best not to be seen as biased in favour of the home side, have succeeded in giving the majority of those awkward decisions which might have gone either way to the opposition.

They will have no such complaints from The Oval, for it looked on the final day of the series of six Tests for the Ashes as though two decisions which perhaps should have gone Australia's way went in favour of England.

However many times one looked at the replay of the caught behind decision against Michael Slater, and from whatever angle, the ball appeared to come off the batsman's arm guard. Allan Border, the Australian captain, may also have been unlucky to have been given caught behind off Angus Fraser soon after lunch.

Yet in the best-regulated of circles which, of course, Test cricket should be, luck will often play an important part. Illogically, perhaps, it is usually predictable, for so often it seems to favour the better side. How often do you hear a winning side complain that they have had bad luck?

This may be simply a variation on the golfer Gary Player's remark when acknowledging the presence of luck. 'The funny thing is that the more I practice the luckier I get.' Which is the same thing as saying that the better one is playing the more likely one is to have the lucky breaks.

For the first time in a year England have played compelling cricket throughout a Test match. Was it therefore a coincidence that for the first time in 12 months the players can have no complaint that luck was against them? Or was it simply that at the very last gasp Ted Dexter managed to persuade Jupiter, Mars and Venus into the right positions?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in