Cricket: Bird wants end to bouncer rule
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DICKIE BIRD, the highly respected umpire, thinks the law restricting use of the bouncer is 'farcical' and that it should be left to umpires to deal with intimidatory bowling.
Bird, who is in New Zealand where he is umpiring the Test series against Pakistan, believes that the experimental rule, now in its third and final year, restricting a bowler to one bouncer per batsman per over is a poor one.
'I think it's a farcical law,' said Bird, who has stood in a record 58 Tests, four World Cups and is now one of the first officials to be used in the International Cricket Council neutral umpire scheme. 'I think you will find it will go in the next 12 months. If, in the opinion of the umpire, it is intimidatory bowling, he's got to stop it. I prefer the old law as it was.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments