Burst of new life breaks deadlock

Tony Cozier says that defensive strategies were upset by yesterday's events

Tony Cozier
Saturday 26 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE superhuman - indeed supernatural - talent of Brian Lara yet again shook a mundane Test back to life at The Oval yesterday.

This was a match that both captains, by their approaches, appeared to have quickly committed to the anti-climax of a draw. This is, without question, the best batting surface of the series and the field placing used by Richie Richardson and Michael Atherton suggested that both were simply content to play for time. Both dispersed their fields defensively, even when they held the initiative: Richardson at the start of the second day when England's innings was still in need of consolidation, Atherton almost from the very start yesterday in spite of his formidable 454.

In addition, England's team selection contradicted Atherton's pre-match assertion that England had only victory in mind. Why then include only four main bowlers and pack their batting? That, too, flew in the face of Raymond Illingworth's repeated insistence on five main bowlers.

All of which made absolutely no difference to Lara. He lives his cricket on a different plane to other mortals. There was an inevitability about his hundred in such conditions. There were three days remaining when he strode to the wicket in the morning and, at the rate at which he scores, it was clear once he got going the West Indies could still manufacture a remarkable victory.

His blazing strokes reduced England's bowlers to mere cannon fodder yesterday. If the West Indies can gain a final lead of about 200 some time around tea this afternoon it will be an uncomfortable time for the home team over the remainder of the match.

The main difference between England and Lara - and, indeed, all the West Indies batsmen - is emphasised by the comparative statistics. While England spent 159 overs accumulating 454, the West Indies, thanks to Lara, but not only Lara, have pulled to within 30 of the lead in 64 fewer overs.

Lara had vital support from Sherwin Campbell and his beleaguered captain, Richardson, that ensured the West Indies rattled along at a run rate of close to five an over. While Lara himself advanced at the incredible striking rate of 86.9 runs for every 100 balls, Campbell was not that far behind in their partnership of 108, his 89 coming from 152 balls. He has been a real find for the West Indies, coming so immediately after the exit of Desmond Haynes and it was cruel luck that he should have been, once more, denied the 100 that has so far eluded him through that most frustrating of dismissals, the leg-side keeper's catch.

Richardson has entered this match in the knowledge that it may well determine his future as captain. He has shown little imagination in his tactics and his batting has been only a shadowy imitation of what it was in his pomp. Seeking a scapegoat for the traumatic loss to Australia last May and the inconsistency of this summer's performances, Richardson has been the obvious candidate. But he has experienced such pressure more than once in his tenure and his sparkling response yesterday was further evidence of his strong character. Whether it is enough to save his job is another matter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in