Athletics: The world record that never was: BAF apologises to Jackson for 'unfair' mistake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COLIN JACKSON yesterday received a public apology from British athletics organisers over the world record that never was.
The British Athletic Federation finally confirmed yesterday that Jackson had not broken the world 60m hurdles record in Glasgow on Saturday, but had only equalled it.
Further study of the photo-finish print showed that Jackson had not clocked 7.35sec as had been announced to a packed Kelvin Hall crowd and millions of television viewers. The time was, in fact, 7.36sec which only equals Greg Foster's seven-year-old record.
The BAF spokesman, Tony Ward, promised the Federation would investigate why it took two days to correct the mistake, even though the photo-finish judges knew about it on Saturday night.
'The buck stops with us for this unfortunate incident, and I think we owe Colin an apology for what happened,' Ward said. 'It was very unfair to an athlete who must have spent Saturday celebrating his new world record to get such deflating news so late afterwards. He's entitled to feel quite angry.'
A less-than-clear negative seemed to indicate Jackson had just dipped under 7.35, but photo-finish judges could not be sure until a print had been taken later in the evening. It showed clearly that Jackson had run a couple of thousandths of a second over 7.35, so his time - under international rules - would have to be rounded up to 7.36.
'I set a personal best and equalled the world record, so what the hell, I'm happy,' Jackson said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments