Athletics: Officials censured in 'no-confidence' case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THREE of Britain's top officials were censured yesterday for their conduct in attempting to oust the chief executive of the British Athletic Federation, Malcolm Jones. But a potential crisis within the sport was averted when their offer to resign over the matter was turned down.
Peter Radford, David Bedford, and John Lister - respectively vice-chairman, secretary and treasurer of the BAF - were reprimanded during a five-hour meeting of the Federation's Council in Birmingham. The council voted 26-16 to express 'serious concern' about their part in secret moves within the Federation's management board to pass a vote of no confidence in the 60-year-old Jones.
All three, who are unpaid, honorary members of the BAF, offered to resign, but they were told that the censure related only to their action over Jones and not did not reflect 'in any shape or form' on their overall contribution.
The council decided that any further action relating to the position of Jones, who was appointed 14 months ago on a three-year contract thought to be worth around pounds 60,000 a year, would not be taken until after the annual meeting on 20 March.
Radford, who is standing for the chairman's position, and Bedford will both be opposed at that meeting. There is no other nomination for Lister's position.
The Federation president, Arthur McAllister, said: 'It was a slap on the wrists. The council did not want their heads.'
He admitted there had been breakdowns in communication over the affair and claimed: 'This outburst of feeling and concern has left the sport in a healthier state.'
Jones, who sat through the meeting, is making no comment.
While the Federation is clearly trying to smooth waters that have become choppy since last month's no-confidence vote, there are underlying dissatisfactions about the running of the sport which need to be addressed. Among the resolutions which will be put to the annual meeting is one from the AAA of England proposing that each of the constituent area associations and each of the commissions for different parts of the sport should have a representative on the management board, which would have the effect of virtually doubling its current number of 10.
While many would argue that the sport needs a streamlined body to deal with its day-to-day affairs, there are others who feel that the leaders have been losing touch.
'It is something that has been bubbling away for some months below the surface,' the BAF spokesman, Tony Ward, said. 'This business with Malcolm Jones has been a catalyst for a lot of anger. You have to take the troops with you if you are embarking on any ambitious move forward. The feeling of today's meeting was clearly that that hadn't been done.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments