Athletics: Modahl wins appeal decision

Mike Rowbottom
Monday 24 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Diane Modahl won a small victory yesterday when a request by the British Athletic Federation to adjourn her appeal against a four-year ban for drug abuse was rejected.

The federation had asked for more time to consider new technical evidence which Modahl's lawyers had introduced at short notice - but the chairman of the three-strong appeal panel Robert Reid, QC ruled that the proceedings should continue.

The new evidence, which is being presented on Modahl's behalf by Professor Simon Gaskill is believed to relate to the way her urine sample was handled by the Portuguese testing authorities last summer.

The first day of the appeal yesterday lasted six hours, with evidence being heard from both sides. Tony Ward, the BAF spokesman, predicted that all the evidence would be heard by today, but that there would not be a decision announced until later in the week.

The venue at the Euston Plaza Hotel in London has been reserved again on Friday if more time is required.

Modahl, six months pregnant, was ushered into the hotel half an hour before yesterday's discussions began and left straight afterwards, accompanied by her husband, Vicente.

The former Commonwealth 800 metres champion has always protested her innocence after large quantities of testosterone were detected in a urine sample taken after she competed in Portugal last July.

Last December a five-strong federation panel were unanimous in finding her guilty. The principal witnesses for the federation then are also taking the stand at the appeal.

Gunnell for Gothenburg, page 23

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in