athletics Doubt on drug-tests

Mike Rowbottom
Thursday 26 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doubts were raised yesterday about the out-of-competition drug testing on which the Sports Council spends up to £200,000 per year, writes Mike Rowbottom.

Chris Carter, British Athletic Federation co-ordinator of the out-of-competition programme, expressed concern at gaps between notifying competitors of a test and taking a sample.

According to Sports Council figures, of 242 out-of-competition tests last year, only 39 were at no notice. "There are ways athletes could show themselves negative if given time," Carter said. "There is an opportunity to cheat."

Michele Verroken, head of the Sports Council's doping unit, said it could take as little as a quarter of an hour to clear the system by cathetering clean urine into the bladder. "Blow masking agents," Verroken said. "A good doper will know all about catheterisation. You can buy a kit at the chemist."

Once the out-of-competition tester makes contact with a competitor, they remain with them until they witness a sample being produced. The danger is when competitors can only be notified indirectly, or if they are unable to comply at once because of othercommitments.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in