Almanack: The answer lies in the soil . . .

Andrew Baker
Saturday 23 October 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A SAD story from Clitheroe FC of the Carling North West Counties League Division One. Strenuous efforts have been made since last season to improve the club's playing surface. But they have been in vain. To quote from the club's programme: 'The work was completed within two days of the season finishing and at the end it resembled a dessert (sic) . . .' Almanack has a suggestion to make. Clitheroe should follow the lead of many top clubs and contact the Sports Turf Research Institute, the Bingley-based boffins who have revolutionised the ground, as it were, on many of our grounds.

'Remember the seas of mud that used to prevail on football grounds not so long ago?' asks the Institute's Mike Canaway. 'There's been a great transformation in pitch surfaces for winter sports in recent years - a great deal of research into things like construction and drainage.'

For instance, the only area where Liverpool and Everton can at present compete with Arsenal and Manchester United is underground: all four clubs have pitches with sand-based construction to benefit the grass's root zone. 'It allows water to get away from the surface,' Mike explains, 'and avoids those old mud-baths.'

The institute's 55 staff advise more than 1,000 UK golf courses, as well as researching surfaces for bowls, rugby, and football. They are even rumoured to advise on the sacred sod of the Centre Court at Wimbledon. But there is one sport which has, so far, declined the advice of the Grass Sages. 'The cricket authorities in this country are reluctant to apply science,' Mike says, 'although there are things that can be assessed: uneven bounce and pace, for instance.' Predictably, the Australian authorities are forging ahead with cricket turf research, financing national ground surveys and assessing pitches by 'firing' balls at them. Mike is disconsolate: 'We're falling behind . . .' he sighs. And no doubt the thought of facing Shane Warne on a pitch designed specially for him will make our players sigh along with him.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in