Senior Twitter figure says Elon Musk’s takeover is ‘weird to process’

It was announced this week that the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive reached an agreement to buy the social media platform for £34.5 billion.

Aine Fox
Wednesday 27 April 2022 17:09 EDT
A senior Twitter figure said he is still processing Elon Musk’s takeover of the social media platform (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
A senior Twitter figure said he is still processing Elon Musk’s takeover of the social media platform (Dominic Lipinski/PA) (PA Archive)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A senior figure at Twitter said it is “weird to process” Elon Musk’s multibillion-pound takeover of the social media platform.

News of the £34.5 billion takeover this week prompted some to question the future safety of the platform and saw some users threaten to leave.

While Twitter founder Jack Dorsey has hailed the decision to let Mr Musk take the social media platform into private ownership and away from the ad model and Wall Street, others have raised concerns about online safety going forward given the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive’s belief in absolute free speech.

Twitter’s senior director of global public policy, Nick Pickles, said he was “still processing” what had happened.

In a comment which sparked laughter during an in-conversation event at Jesus College, Cambridge on Wednesday, he told how he had been off work on holiday at the beginning of the week when the news broke.

He said: “It was weird because I got on the Tube on Tuesday and every front page was a picture of the bird (the Twitter symbol), a picture of, you know, kind of Elon and it’s, I don’t know, it’s weird to process.”

He said the conversation and reaction prompted by the move reminded him that “it’s an incredible privilege to work at a service that has that bigger impact on the world”.

He added: “I’m also obviously like still processing, kind of, what’s happened.

“So I’m just grateful to work at a company that’s this relevant I guess.”

Asked whether it is a good idea for Twitter to be owned by one person, Mr Pickles said “the service is what matters”.

He said: “There are absolute upsides to not being a publicly traded company, particularly for a service like us that is under political pressure all over the world, that is under pressure to intervene in how people are kind of connecting.”

He added: “For me, it’s like, the service is what matters, and I think, as is naturally the case, there’s lots of hypotheticals this week, there’s lots of kind of people kind of pontificating and speculating on what might happen. Focus on the service, that’s what’s really important.”

When it comes to controversial figures such as Donald Trump and Katie Hopkins being allowed to return to Twitter after being banned, Mr Pickles said the issue for people getting accounts back has not been “figured out” yet.

He said: “What is the journey back for any account? It’s something that I think industry writ large has not figured out.”

He said the issue was the “digital equivalent” of people being in jail for things that are now legal.

He added: “I think it’s not really about any one account. It’s about how do you solve that broader issue of permanently removing people’s access to services is generally-speaking a bad outcome. So I think the question is like, what does the solution to that look like? And I think we’re a long way away from figuring it out.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in