Watchdog calls for estate agent regulations shake-up

Press Association,Holly Williams
Thursday 18 February 2010 08:30 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rules on how homes are sold in the UK are holding back online alternatives to estate agents and leading to weak competition on commission fees, the consumer watchdog said today.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) said regulations, dating back to 1979, needed to be overhauled to allow competitors to grow and challenge the traditional estate agency model.

Its study into home buying and selling also found that a failure from sellers to negotiate on estate agency fees could be costing consumers up to £570 million a year.

Regulations could be relaxed for online alternatives not involved in risky activities, such as getting involved in price negotiations, to allow greater competition, according to the OFT.

While overall the OFT said the estate agent market and regulation was working well, it said there was a case for further rules - or even a potential ban - on estate agents referring ancillary services such as mortgage advice due to conflict of interest fears.

It found that the fees-for-referral system could lead to agents pushing forward one buyer over another, to the detriment of the seller.

Today's report also looked at the overall buying process in England and Wales and found that there were possible benefits of introducing a binding commitment between buyers and sellers earlier.

But it stopped short of recommending changing the model to a similar system to that used in Scotland as it said there could be "significant" difficulties involved in changing it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in