Property: Lead piping

Anne Spackman
Friday 16 September 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NIGEL McCULLOUGH is an estate agent with a criminal record. His crime was not to notice that some concealed piping in a house he was selling was lead, showing the house could not have been replumbed in 1988 as his client had told him and had confirmed in writing.

Mr McCullough, an agent with 25 unblemished years' experience, was selling a Fifties semi in the Loopland area of Belfast for pounds 32,500. The house was bought by Robert and Edna Wilkinson in the summer of 1993. According to the sales details it had been replumbed in 1988.

When the Wilkinsons discovered the lead in the kitchen, they called Mr McCullough who immediately agreed the matter would have to be put right. When there was a disagreement over the price for the job, Mr Wilkinson reported the case to trading standards officers under the Property Misdescriptions Act.

The house had been sold by Tom McKeown on behalf of his father. He was horrified to discover he had supplied incorrect information to the agent. He went back to his father and found that although the solid-fuel heating system had been replumbed, the hot and cold water pipes had not. He offered to pay for the work, which cost him nearly pounds 1,000.

Despite the fact that the mistake was rectified at no cost to the buyer, and despite the fact that the agent used a seller's questionnaire to confirm all the sales details, he was prosecuted. Belfast magistrates said they accepted it was a 'genuine and innocent mistake', but they fined him pounds 50.

The Property Misdescriptions Act was brought in to deal with the many cowboys who went into estate agency in the Eighties. But if trading standards officers continue to interpret it this tightly, agents may ask for it to be scrapped - with some justification. That would be bad news for the public who need some form of redress against agents who deceive them in their most important purchase.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in