Building up Berkshire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A further 40,000 homes have been given the go-ahead in Berkshire, that hotbed of Nimbyism - but only by the narrowest of margins.
The county council's environment committee has given way to pressure from Environment Secretary John Gummer, who demanded that it raised targets.
Even after Tory and Labour councillors joined forces, the higher figures scraped through by only one vote.
Everyone appears to be disappointed, however.
The House Builders Federation estimates that 55,000 new homes are needed up to 2006 to relieve increasing demand. Even the government inspectors who examined the county's plans recommended 48,000 homes.
The Council for the Protection of Rural England is angry that Berkshire will have to provide so much land. It says there is plenty of space for homes on reclaimed sites within London rather than taking over more green fields.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments