Government urged to take "aggressive steps" to increase home-ownership or face huge housing benefit costs

By 2060, the state will need to spend an extra £8.13 billion on Housing Benefit for older people, says new report

Alex Johnson
Wednesday 27 June 2012 05:50 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Future Cost of Housing Benefit for Older People, released today by the Strategic Society Centre, looks at the impact of the growing pensioner population on the cost of financing Housing Benefit.

James Lloyd, Director of the Strategic Society Centre and author of the report, argues that the discussion about falling rates of home-ownership is overlooking important public spending implications.

"At present, concerns about 'Generation Rent' are typically portrayed in terms of the 'human cost', families forced to rent, young people missing out on the satisfaction of owning their home," says Lloyd. "However, although the 'human cost' of declining rates of owner occupation are undoubtedly important, the costs to public spending in the long-term are mostly ignored, despite – arguably – being more important."

The report suggests that, on the assumption that two out of five of today's 20-year olds will rent for their whole life, by 2060 the state will need to spend an extra £8.13 billion in today's terms on Housing Benefit for older people.

"Higher rates of home-ownership are ultimately cheaper for the taxpayer," says Lloyd. "Given trends in longevity and owner-occupation which will conspire to see the cost of the Housing Benefit bill for the public purse increase by 153% by2060, it is legitimate for policymakers to take aggressive steps to increase rates of owner occupation now, in order to reduce these costs."

He points in particular to the importance of new home building and construction of new social housing and suggests policymakers should examine 'overconsumption' of housing such as second home ownership, and the size of the buy-to-let sector.

"Although the current rules around ownership and property-taxation enable some individuals to own multiple properties, such behaviourwill impose significant costs on the Exchequer in the long-term, and policymakers therefore have alegitimate reason to implement strident measures toreduce such activities," he concludes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in