Alice Jones: Oh, Salman! You can't win the Booker and then start largin' it on Twitter

 

Friday 02 December 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Breaking news: Salman Rushdie can't spell hot. Or rather, he probably can, but on Twitter, in his messages to a nubile New York socialite, he spells it "hottt", as in "you look so gorgeous and hottt!".

The Booker Prize-winning novelist, 64, joined Twitter only in September but has taken to it so enthusiastically that in less than three months he has racked up 1,218 tweets and counting. Perhaps inevitably, he now finds himself the victim of a Twit-sting, at the hands of Devorah Rose, the twentysomething editor of a glossy Hamptons magazine, Social Life, who apparently dined out with Rushdie a few times.

He asked her out on Facebook, continued the flirtation on Twitter and then, after a change of heart, let her down gently with a textbook "it's not you, it's me" message. "I'm sorry to say that I don't feel able to pursue what we only just began," he typed. "I hope that we can remain friends."

Rose has now splashed the private messages to her 1,400 or so followers on Twitter. All rather embarrassing for Rushdie, but he's entitled to date who he likes. Far more embarrassing is that his tweets to Rose throb with the hormonal mis-spellings of a teenager. His Facebook messages are sprinkled with – the horror! – emoticons. He uses words like "badassery" in public.

To see a novelist mangling words and using smiley yellow cartoon faces to convey emotions is jarring, to say the least. Shouldn't our literary greats follow the surly Julian Barnes model and save their words for slim prize-winning volumes? Or, failing that, take a leaf out of Martin Amis's book and store up one's private spleen for occasional, explosive flurries in the media?

Maybe not. We might like the idea of intellectual writers watching over our precious English language in ivory towers but the mundane truth is that writing is a day job. When Rushdie and his ilk are not elegantly encased between two hard covers, they can make for rather a prosaic and dispiriting read; it's a case of never tweet your heroes. So now I've done to Rushdie what I did to Bret Easton Ellis when he tweeted that The Human Centipede 2 was a "likable and charming" film. It's the only thing, really, a true book-lover can do: reader, I unfollowed him.

www.twitter.com/alicevjones

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in