Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US warns Iraq this time it will go all the way

Rupert Cornwell
Sunday 09 October 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WITH THE US Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, warning President Saddam Hussein that he would pay a 'horrendous price' if he went too far, the Pentagon at the weekend despatched more troops, ships and aircraft to the Gulf as part of a build-up of firepower to deter any Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

Simultaneously, as part of a verbal barrage designed to show Washington was in earnest, President Clinton's top advisers dropped heavy hints that if Iraq did provoke a war, the allies were ready this time to go all the way to Baghdad.

'I'm not going to go into details,' said the White House Chief of Staff, Leon Panetta, when asked whether Washington would now not be forced to send troops again if it had 'finished off Saddam' in the 1991 Gulf war, 'but I can tell you this: we're not going to make the mistakes of the past.'

From Jerusalem, Mr Christopher, who has added Kuwait to the itinerary of his Middle East visit as a symbol of Washington's commitment to the emirate's security, struck a similar note: 'Saddam's been thoughtless in the past, but it would be sheer madness this time.'

Last night Pentagon intelligence officials claimed to detect no sign that an attack was imminent. And diplomats in the region contested the US assessment that Iraq could be planning an invasion. But Mr Panetta said that the US was not sure why President Saddam had amassed an estimated 64,000 men, including elite units from the Republican Guard, so close to the border: 'It could be an invasion, it could be bluster, it could be just a threat.' But, he said, Washington had 'to assume the worst'.

The strengthening of US forces in the Gulf was in full swing last night. On the way from the Mediterranean, the aircraft carrier George Washington was due to enter the Red Sea, while 4,000 mechanised troops were on their way from the US to Kuwait, where they would join the 2,000 Marines aboard four ships in the northern Gulf.

The US Defense Secretary, William Perry, said the Pentagon was despatching a 'formidable force' of F-15s, F-16s and anti-tank A-10 Warthogs into the region, where the US and its allies already have 140 aircraft in Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait itself. In addition, two warships, equipped with cruise missiles, are in range of Iraq, while the newly arrived US troops can draw on stockpiles of weapons, fuel and ammunition pre-positioned in and around Kuwait. The Pentagon said last night it was to start moving 18,000 Marines and thousands of additional army troops to the Gulf within days. Amid the bellicose talk, Mr Clinton returned to the White House from Camp David to consult advisers.

An unexplained element was the massing of thousands of unarmed civilians, who pitched tents on Iraq's side of the border yesterday to stage a sit-in protest. Britain's Ambassador to the United Nations, Sir David Hannay, said yesterday: 'Iraq is not the sort of country where demonstrations happen by mistake or happen spontaneously. They happen because the regime wants them to happen, and that is a dangerous place to start having a demonstration.'

(Photograph omitted)

Leading article, page 15

Robert Fisk, page 16

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in