Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US tries to ease Russian Nato fears

Andrew Marshall
Monday 20 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

President Bill Clinton is to write to Boris Yeltsin suggesting a security framework linking Russia and Nato to try to calm Moscow's fears about the extension of the Western alliance to central Europe.

The idea received general approval from Nato ambassadors in Brussels yesterday. Mr Yeltsin has warned of a "cold peace" if Nato enlarges to take in former Warsaw Pact countries. Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia are the main contenders.

There is deep concern that relations have deteriorated badly over the last year, beyond the public rows. Some Nato officials fear that, despite efforts to build bridges with Russia and, in particular its military, the most important officers still have little concept of Nato beyond that learnt in the Cold War.

Mr Clinton's letter will set out a wider relationship between Russia and the West. However, it does not propose a new Nato-Russian security agreement, according to Nato sources, but refers to two existing agreements - one setting out Russia's participation in the Partnership for Peace, the other for a broader dialogue, which Russia agreed but then did not sign.

Russia has invited Mr Clinton to a special summit on 8 May to mark the end of the Second World War in Europe. Such a meeting could cement closer ties and advance the creation of a new security architecture for Europe, a cherished goal of the Clinton administration.

Nato diplomats were not shown the Clinton letter, but were briefed and given the chance to make suggestions about the line to be taken.

The exercise goes back to a meeting between Warren Christopher, the US Secretary of State, and Andrei Kozyrev, the Russian Foreign Minister, last month. Russia is expected to reply with its own ideas, and, it is hoped, with a date when it will sign the two agreements.

However, in the longer term there may be a more formal agreement between Nato and Moscow, according to some diplomats and officials.

The idea has been frequently discussed but it may take until later this year to emerge as a fully-fledged proposal. The concept of a new East- West agreement stirs some deep fears, not least in those countries in central Europe that may not come into the alliance.

Nato is conducting a study of the implications of enlargement which should be finished this year. The US wants this study to lead straight on to decisions on who should join and when.

Last year European members of Nato were worried that the US was trying to accelerate the entry of new members. The US decision to pass the letter through Nato may have been intended to reassure the European members no over-hasty steps were being taken.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in