US politicians in `cybersquat' war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HOW CAN an ambitious US political candidate play really dirty in these jaded times? On the Internet, of course. From the country that dreamt up the dark art of political burglary and the even darker art of shaming a rival through sexual revelations comes a very Nineties spin on negative campaigning: grabbing all possible permutations of an opponent's website.
In San Francisco, where November's mayoral race is bringing out the very worst in several prospective candidates, the incumbent Willie Brown was incensed to discover recently that dozens of names he might have wanted, from the straight-arrow williebrown.com to the more playful damayor.com, had already been registered and paid for by his most dangerous opponent, the real estate magnate Clint Reilly. The Reilly camp even hogged williesucks.com for good measure.
Meanwhile, in New York's increasingly vicious Senate race, both of next year's prospective candidates are being beset by web woes. Rudolph Giuliani, New York City's Republican mayor, successfully registered the pithy Internet name rudyyes.com only to discover a group of jokers had snapped up yesrudy.com and posted a superficially convincing parody site detailing his supposed admiration for Baby Doc Duvalier, the erstwhile dictator of Haiti.
Hillary Clinton was so determined to secure hillary2000.com that she agreed to pay $6,000 (pounds 3,750) to get it back from an enterprising cyberspace freak who had snapped it up.
It seems there is nothing a candidate can do about such flagrant examples of "cybersquatting": that is, denying other people a website name for malicious or commercial reasons. All it takes to register a website is a proposed name and a $70 fee - opening the field not only to spiteful opponents and parodists but also to ethically dubious business tycoons.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments