US budget compromise in sight
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WASHINGTON - President Clinton appeared last night to be negotiating his way towards a political compromise with Democrats on Capitol Hill that should allow his budget proposals to be approved in the House of Representatives today, writes David Usborne.
The fate of the budget package, on which Mr Clinton has pinned his presidency, remains uncertain, however, and White House officials conceded that, with several conservative Democrats still unhappy with provisions for an energy tax, it may pass with only a thin margin.
An alternative plan favours eliminating the energy tax and replacing it with additional spending cuts on social benefits such as Medicaid.
After consultations with Democrat members, the President acknowledged that the energy tax provisions still represented a 'big hang-up' in his negotiations, but none the less expressed guarded optimism that his package would win through.
'I think it is now apparent to everyone that there's only two plans on the table . . . and ours is far fairer and better for the economy,' the President declared. His proposals call for dollars 340bn (pounds 222bn) in tax increases and spending cuts over four years as a means of attacking the federal deficit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments