US accuses Iraq over oil deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New York - The United States yesterday accused Iraq of trying to use a strictly limited oil-for-food agreement reached with the United Nations in May as a means to circumvent the broader trade sanctions imposed upon it after the Gulf War.
The deal, achieved after months of acrimonious negotiations, was designed to permit Iraq to export up to $2bn (pounds 1.3bn) worth of oil over six months on condition that the proceeds were used exclusively for the purchase of urgently needed humanitarian supplies, including food and medicines.
Yesterday, however, the US served notice that a plan from the Iraqi government last week detailing how it intended carrying out the agreement was unacceptable.
The US objection means that the agreement, which was meant to allay the suffering visited on the Iraqi population, may be delayed by several weeks or months. British officials would not say whether London concurred with the American assessment.
Speaking of the Iraqi document, the US spokesman at the UN, James Rubin, accused Iraq of "trying to backtrack" on the agreement reached on 20 May and of trying "to turn this humanitarian exception into a partial lifting of sanctions". He added that the plan, "contains several provisions that make it clear that Iraq is not serious at this point as far as implementing" the oil-for-food agreement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments