UN set to let Iraq sell oil worth $2bn
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New York - The UN Security Council yesterday appeared close to approving a deal for Iraq to sell $2bn (£1.3bn) in oil over six months to buy badly needed food and medical supplies.
Sponsors of the resolution - the United States, Britain, Argentina and Oman - wanted the measure adopted last night and the Council President, Karel Kovanda, said he was working hard to meet the deadline. A similar resolution has been on the books since 1991 but Iraq rejected it.
The new measure raises the amount of oil Baghdad may sell and eases UN monitoring of the distribution of humanitarian supplies.
This time Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tareq Aziz, is actively negotiating with the sponsors, mainly through Argentina's ambassador, Emilio Cardenas. Mr Aziz has said little but Mr Cardenas told reporters he thought Iraq's attitude was "a bit more positive".
Joe Sills, the UN chief spokesman, said there was "more hope on this not just being approved by the council but being acceptable to Iraq. But I am not making a prediction."
Mr Cardenas estimated the oil sales proceeds available to Iraq would be close to $650m out of each $1bn. A 30 per cent deduction, $300m of every $1bn, would be earmarked for a Gulf War reparations fund and another $50m would go to meet other UN costs.
France and Russia argue that there is no point in adopting the resolution unless it is acceptable to the Iraqis. If it is not, they say, it will turn into a public relations tool enabling the US and Britain to continue blaming Iraq for hardships caused by sanctions imposed when Baghdad's troops invaded Kuwait in August 1990.
Iraq is still reported to be concerned that acceptance of this deal might be a substitute for a complete lifting of the embargo.
France and Russia, backed by China, Indonesia and possibly other states, had wanted sanctions on oil exports lifted entirely once Rolf Ekeus, chairman of the UN special commission in charge of scrapping Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, has completed his work.
But Mr Ekeus dashed hopes of a speedy end to the embargo when he said in a report distributed on Monday that Iraq had failed to account for large quantities of "growth media" that could be used to produce bacteriological weapons.
This week France and Russia have been negotiating intensively on the limited-oil sale resolution. "A deal is within reach," the Russian ambassador, Sergei Lavrov, said.
A 1991 Gulf War ceasefire resolution ties sanctions on exports of goods such as oil to a clean bill of health on weapons.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments