Sydney - Fourteen South Pacific countries condemned the Chinese explosion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sydney - Fourteen South Pacific countries condemned the Chinese explosion and challenged the French president, Jacques Chirac, to call off the French nuclear testing, writes Robert Milliken.
At a meeting in Brisbane, the environment ministers of the South Pacific Forum nations called for an immediate end to all nuclear testing, and demanded that France release secret scientific data on the environmental impact of its tests at Mururoa and Fangataufa atolls over the past 30 years.
The political campaign suffered a tactical setback in the form of a scientific report, released at the meeting on Wednesday, which claimed that the French tests were likely to pose little risk to human health. Commissioned from 18 Australian scientists by the Australian government, as this year's forum chairman, the report was seized upon by the French government to support its claim that the Pacific countries did not know what they were talking about.
The report said that in a worst-case scenario, radioactive contamination could leak from under the atoll within 25 years, or in 750 years at best.
Either way, it suggested that the risk would be greatest for those living and working on the atoll and insignificant for people living elsewhere in the Pacific.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments