Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rwanda foes agree to hold ceasefire talks next week

Richard Dowden,Africa Editor
Thursday 26 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A UNITED NATIONS envoy said last night that both sides in the Rwanda civil war had agreed to meet on Monday to discussa ceasefire.

Having crossed the front line of the fighting to talk to both sides, Iqbal Riza, the UN's deputy head of peace- keeping, said: 'We had very, very useful discussions with General Kagame (military leader of the Rwanda Patriotic Front) and we agreed that the two military sides should meet in Kigali on Monday and work out a process towards a ceasefire.'

Mr Riza has spent all week shuttling between the government and the rebels. He had talks with the RPF chairman, Alexis Kanyarengwe, on Monday, with the army chief, General Augustine Bizimungu, on Tuesday, and with government leaders at their refuge at Gitarama, near Kigali, on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, in Washington the UN Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, criticised advocates of human rights yesterday for being 'strangely reluctant' to take action to halt the massacre in Rwanda.

In a speech at Johns Hopkins University, Mr Boutros- Ghali called for 'forceful action' to stop the killing in Rwanda, where tens of thousands of people have been slaughtered. He said the UN's priority was humanitarian relief. But he asked: 'What can be done to stop such massive slaughter inside a country's borders?'

There was scarcely a break in the fighting during Mr Riza's visit to Kigali yesterday. Despite agreement about a ceasefire during his visit, the rebels' artillery opened up as he left government-held parts of the city in a military convoy to visit the rebel headquarters at Byumba, 50 miles north. There he met Paul Kagame, the RPF's military leader, and as they talked, RPF fighters took the suburb of Kicukiro, near the airport, which the rebels seized four days ago. The RPF has laid siege to Gatenga, reported to be the base of the extremist Hutu militias that have been carrying out the killings.

All of which leads many observers and diplomats to be initially sceptical about the sincerity of the RPF in agreeing to a ceasefire. It is widely regarded as a breathing-space to allow their forces to regroup before continuing their advance. One UN official described the RPF demands as very tough. 'They are demanding a complete end to the government's ability to wage war,' he said.

However, it has always been their policy that it would meet the government's military chiefs to discuss how the massacres of civilians could be stopped. The RPF's policy is to take over as much of the country as quickly as possible to halt the massacres. It has refused to talk to the rump government, accusing it of being behind the killings, but has tried to divide the army from the government.

The government, on the other hand, is losing the military struggle and has agreed a UN plan for a ceasefire. There are few signs that the loyalty of the army to the interim government is slipping, and so far it has resisted any RPF offers of a separate peace.

But the conventional war has almost become a sub-plot to the massacres, and the question is whether an end to the fighting will mean an end to the killings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in