US was 'dubious' from the start, says disappointed Blix
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hans Blix, the chief United Nations weapons inspector, said yesterday he was "disappointed" at the decision to go to war before his teams had completed their work.
Mr Blix told BBC Radio 4's Today that he was not sure Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and said UN inspectors had been getting more co-operation from the Iraqis before the US and Britain pulled the plug on their efforts. He did not believe the Security Council had intended the inspection process, initiated by resolution 1441 in November, to last less than four months.
Mr Blix, talking to reporters shortly before the first missiles struck Baghdad yesterday morning, said he was "curious" whether the Allies would find evidence of weapons of mass destruction after the war.
Intelligence given by the US to his team during their inspections had been largely discredited, he said. "We have never maintained or asserted that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, whether anthrax or nerve gas. What we have said is that their reporting on it demonstrated great lacunae in the accounting.
"But having something unaccounted for is not the same thing as saying it does exist ... If they don't have it, then it is very difficult for them to give the evidence. When the Americans go in, they will be able to ask people who will no longer be in fear and if the Iraqis have something, they will probably be led to it.
"I am very curious to see if they find something. The paradox is, if they don't find something, then you have sent in 250,000 men to wage war in order to find nothing."
Asked how he felt about having to withdraw his inspection teams, Mr Blix said: "It is clearly a disappointment. We began about three-and-a-half months ago and I think we made a very rapid start."
Mr Blix said he thought the US had been dubious from the beginning of the inspection process that it would lead to Iraqi disarmament.
"The resolution adopted last autumn was one that was extremely demanding and perhaps they doubted the Iraqis would go along with it," he said.
"But the Iraqis did co-operate with us and [the Americans] lost patience some time at the end of January or the beginning of February."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments