Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US and France close to deal on climate change

Philip Thornton,Economics Correspondent
Thursday 07 July 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There was growing optimism on the fringes of the Gleneagles summit that the United States and France had been able to reach a compromise on the thorny issue of climate change.

Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, rushed up from London to take over the chairmanship of the meetings after the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, returned to London in the wake of the terrorist attacks.

The final terms of the deal are unlikely to satisfy environmentalists, who want all countries to sign up to binding targets on the carbon emissions that scientists say are causing the world to heat up.

Original plans to produce two separate communiqués - one today on Africa and another yesterday on climate change, global terrorism and the world economy - were scrapped in the wake of yesterday's events.

Amid tightened security, Sir Michael Jay, the Government's chief negotiator, took over the negotiations following the Prime Minister's departure. On climate change, it is understood that a deal was agreed in principle - although it contained no new figures. The wording gives France some of the tough language it wanted. The communiqué is expected to include an explicit reference to the Kyoto treaty, which the US has not signed, and an acceptance on the scientific front that climate change is occurring and induced by man.

Mr Blair said that the intention of the summit had not been "go back over" the terms of the Kyoto treaty. "We're not going to negotiate some new treaty in climate change at the G8 summit. That's not what it's about," he said. "We're not going to resolve every single issue at the G8 summit in relation to this but I think what we can do is narrow the issues down, get agreement that there is a problem, that we need to tackle it, that we need to move forward together in doing so."

Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, revealed this week that the World Bank is expected to play a frontline role in the fight against global warning by offering financial incentives to developing countries to cut their greenhouse emissions and adopt "clean" technologies.

Mr Brown also said that the communiqué would double aid to Africa - a key demand of campaign leaders such as Bono and Bob Geldof - by 2010. The issue of debt relief was largely settled last month from finance ministers from the G7 agreed to write off $40bn (£23bn) of debts held by 18 poor countries to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

After hours of negotiations, hopes were mounting of a deal on the issue of trade - the trickiest issue out of the so-called "trinity" of debt, aid and trade.

The communiqué is expected to set a timetable for the elimination of export farm subsidies. This has proved a thorny issue between the UK, which wants abolition by 2010 and the French, who have demanded a delay until 2016.

One source said that the G8 was determined to make a gesture, adding that the US was happy to comply with the demands of other countries in the wake of its resolution of its dispute with the World Trade Organisation over cotton subsidies.

Oil prices featured prominently in discussions yesterday after hitting $62 a barrel this week, despite expectations that the leaders would appeal for more stable prices and more freedom for oil companies to invest in oil-rich countries.

There were no plans to include any comment on currencies in the economic communiqué. G8 leaders were also due to discuss foreign policy issues, particularly the Middle East, although they were not expected to make any major announcements.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in