Security Council divided over the next step
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The report on Monday by Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, cast a pall of anxiety over considerations of the United Nations Security Council last night, but failed to disguise deep divisions over what to do next.
"The report has changed the character of the debate," Sir Jeremy Greenstock, the British ambassador, said yesterday. He said Council members continued to voice different opinions over whether the time had arrived to respond with force.
"Some members of the Council see the glass as half full and some members of the Council see the glass as half empty," he said.
Sir Jeremy said, however, that the UN had already made clear that Iraq's co-operative attitude "must be unequivocably a full glass, no messing around, no prevarication".
America's ambassador, John Negroponte, said the "diplomatic window" for Iraq to show co-operation was closing quickly. He referred to the Security Council session set for 5 February to hear a presentation by US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, of US intelligence detailing Iraqi non-cooperation with arms inspectors.
The task for the US and for Britain to persuade the Council to authorise force remains a tough one. The Russian ambassador, Sergei Lavrov, said last night that inspections needed more time, contradicting reports that President Vladimir Putin had signalled a shift in his more patient stance with Baghdad. "Our position has not changed," he said "If Iraq stops co-operating with inspectors and starts blocking inspections we must look into it."
The split in the Council was evident in statements from the ambassador of Spain, who said his government was "very sceptical as to the goodwill" of Iraq, and of Mexico, who said that the inspections have proved their "usefulness and must therefore continue".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments