Russia condemns Washington for piling pressure on inspectors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tensions between veto-holding members of the UN Security Council grew yesterday after Russia said pressure was being exerted on weapons inspectors to give a negative assessment of Iraqi compliance or to accept they will have to leave the country soon.
Russia's outburst, which appeared to be directed at the United States, came as Washington and London continued to agonise over the timing and content of a new resolution to authorise disarming Iraq by military means. It is expected to surface early next week.
"Inspectors are being subjected to very strong pressure in order to provoke their departure from Iraq, or to present to the Security Council assessments which could be used as a pretext for the use of force against Iraq," said Igor Ivanov, the Russian Foreign Minister.
Mr Ivanov did not mention America directly. Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, receives diplomats from Security Council members almost daily in New York, all of whom impress their views on him. Any fresh sign of impatience from Moscow is certain to jangle British and American nerves. China, France and Russia each have veto power in the Council and have all voiced their preference to hold off the military option.
"We urge the international inspectors to continue to fulfil their professional activity objectively," Mr Ivanov added.
Even without a veto, Britain and America face an uphill task in finding the nine votes for a new resolution.There were signs, meanwhile, that they would make clear to other members that they would not tolerate debate in the Security Council beyond 14 March.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments