Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

North Korea makes surprise request for direct negotiations with South

David Usborne
Sunday 20 April 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The stand-off with North Korea over its alleged nuclear weapons ambitions took another unexpected turn yesterday when the regime of Kim Jong Il proposed holding direct talks with South Korea later this month.

Officials from the North made the request in a telephone call to counterparts from the South at the border village of Panmunjom. They asked for cabinet-level talks between the two Koreas in Pyongyang, the North Korean capital, from 27 to 29 April.

The approach came just one day after Pyongyang appeared to intensifythe crisis by proclaiming that its scientists had almost finished reprocessing spent fuel rods at Yongbyon, its main nuclear facility, with a view to producing weapons-grade plutonium.

American diplomats were uncertain how to assess the latest signals from Pyongyang. The United States and North Korea are preparing to begin highly delicate talks along with China in Beijing possibly as soon as this week.

Pyongyang has often tried to drive a wedge between Seoul and Washington, traditional allies, arguing that the peninsula's future should be left to the two Koreas to sort out. In a message delivered by the state news agency, KCNA, the regime emphasised "the need to resourcefully settle the issue of inter-Korean relations by the nation itself through national co-operation".

Meanwhile, the North raised the spectre of an American military attack on its soil yesterday in an apparent attempt to stir anti-American sentiment in the South. North Korea's state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper said all Koreans "should firmly unite as one to resolutely smash the US moves for a war of aggression in order to protect the destiny of the nation and the future of a reunified country".

Washington has also been unsettled by Pyongyang's assertions on the reprocessing of fuel rods. A North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman was quoted at the weekend as saying: "We are successfully reprocessing more than 8,000 spent fuel rods at the final phase."

There was some argument yesterday over the accuracy of the statement, amid suggestions that the remarks of the spokesman may have been mistranslated. A Korean version published on Saturday said that facilities were at the "final stage" before reprocessing. There is no certainty among Western intelligence agencies that the reprocessing of rods at Yongbyon has even begun.

Officials in Seoul interpreted the remark as another effort by Pyongyang to raise the stakes ahead of its meeting with the US, set to be the first since last October when the crisis erupted.

"We think North Korea is trying to gain leverage ahead of the talks," argued South Korea's top security adviser, Ra Jong-il.

Diplomatic experts in the West are divided over Pyongyang's intentions. While some believe that it is in earnest when it proclaims its intention to reprocess the rods and build its nuclear arsenal, others speculate that Kim Jong Il is simply trying to wrest new economic concessions from the West before backing down.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in