Iraq's dossier 'lies', say US and Britain
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain and America took another step towards war with Iraq yesterday when Jack Straw said Saddam Hussein's claims he had destroyed his weapons of mass destruction were an "obvious falsehood".
The Foreign Secretary pointed to "obvious omissions" in the 12,000-word Iraqi dossier as the Government piled pressure on Iraq and the UN Security Council a day before Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, was to offer the council his preliminary verdict on President Saddam's declaration.
Mr Straw said: "It is clear, even on a preliminary assessment, it is not the full and complete declaration requested." Tony Blair said he was sceptical about the dossier.
In a hardline statement similar to Mr Straw's,Ari Fleischer, George Bush's spokesman, said the President was concerned about "omissions" and "problems" in Iraq's account.
Some senior Ministry of Defence figures believe military action could start by the end of next month. Britain confirmed it was chartering ships to carry heavy armour to the Gulf. Further warships could follow a naval task group to the region in the new year.
But the Chief of Defence Staff, Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, Britain's most senior military commander, saidlast night that the armed forces were feeling "frustration"over the lack of a clear plan.
The Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, indicated to BBC2's Newsnight program-me that gaps in the declaration were unlikely, by themselves, to trigger military action. "It is ... also deliberate obstruction by Iraq of the inspectors and of the process set out in the resolution," he said.
A senior official from Iraq's ruling Baath party, who wanted to remain anonymous, said Iraqis could cope with the current tensions because they have been "living in a state of war for the past 20 years".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments