Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dirty bomb ingredients easy to steal, UN warns

Andrew Buncombe
Tuesday 25 June 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

More than 100 countries around the world need to upgrade their security to prevent the theft of radioactive materials that could be used to build a "dirty bomb", a report by the United Nations warns.

Some of these countries, including the US and many EU nations, must also do more to recover missing supplies.

"What is needed is cradle-to-grave control of powerful radioactive sources to protect them against terrorism or theft," said Mohamed El Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN body that produced the report.

"One of our priorities is to assist states in creating and strengthening national regulatory infrastructures to ensure that these radioactive sources are appropriately regulated and adequately secured at all times."

A total of 82 countries are understood to have asked the agency for help in this area.

The report is part of the agency's expanded efforts since the attacks of 11 September to tighten security around radioactive material that could be used to make dirty bombs.

Such devices use conventional explosives to spread radioactive material over a limited area. While experts believe such an attack would initially kill no more people than a conventional bomb, the dispersal of substances such as cobalt-60, strontium-90, caesium-137 or iridium-192 would lead to many other people being exposed. It would also create huge panic.

Because of the relative ease with which they can be made, dirty bombs have become something of an obsession, particularly in America.

Earlier this month, US officials arrested an alleged American al-Qa'ida operative, Jose Padilla, who was said to be plotting to build and detonate a dirty bomb in Washington. Mr Padilla is in custody, where he is being treated as an "illegal combatant".

While the IAEA report did not list the 100 countries it said may not be doing enough to prevent the theft of radioactive material, it did highlight one region long known to be a marketplace for radioactive material – former Soviet states such as Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. "Uncontrolled radioactive sources are a widespread phenomenon in [such] states," the report said.

Two weeks ago, the agency – in what it considered a significant move forward – brokered an agreement between the US and Russia to develop a plan to locate and secure materials throughout the former Soviet Union. The US Department of Energy and Russia's Ministry for Atomic Energy will try to recycle such material. But the report pointed out that the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission had revealed that American companies had lost track of 1,500 items of radioactive material since 1996.

It also drew attention to a European Union study which estimated that every year up to 70 radioactive sources were lost from regulatory control and that many countries would not even notice if such materials were taken.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in