Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Britain hopes to break UN deadlock

David Usborne,Phil Reeves
Tuesday 11 March 2003 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain is expected to unveil proposals as early as today that it hopes will help break deadlock at the UN on adopting a new resolution forcing Iraq to disarm. They will include specific tests for Baghdad to answer as well as a "very limited" extension of the 17 March deadline set last week.

London has identified a set of "real concrete actions the Iraqis could take to demonstrate quickly that they have made a turnaround" and are serious about disarmament, a source said. There will be no more than 10 of these and they are likely to include actions such as allowing interviews of scientists abroad.

Britain sees the plan as its last hope of bringing round six undecided countries sitting on the Security Council and possibly reaching the nine votes needed to pass the resolution.

Canada, meanwhile, offered its own compromise that would extend the deadline for three more weeks. Then a positive vote of the Council would be needed to declare that Iraq was complying substantially.

Separately, UN inspectors said they had withdrawn two U-2 spy aircraft from Iraqi airspace for "safety reasons" after Baghdad protested that they had been in the air and that the second plane was "hostile". American officials said Iraqi jets escorted one out of Iraqi airspace.

There was still deep uncertainty over how the British proposals would fare. Many of the six uncertain countries may prefer the Canadian version. Seen by The Independent, it states Iraq should also take "imperative steps" that would be set out by Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, and "implement those disarmament tasks no later than 15 April 2003". Washington will not tolerate so late a deadline.

The Iraqi ambassador to the UN, Mohammed al-Douri, opened a special meeting of the Security Council open to all UN members last night with a call for governments to resist the resolution and "prevent a catastrophe which has now become imminent". He added: "Iraq has taken the strategic decision to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction."

Speakers at the session repeatedly argued against military action. But the six wavering Council members ­ Angola, Cameroon, Guinea, Chile, Mexico and Pakistan ­ still had no common position. Cameroon requested a 45-day ultimatum for Iraq and Pakistan's Prime Minister, Zafarullah Khan Jamali, made a TV address to declare that it would be "very difficult" for his government to support a war.

Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's ambassador to the UN, said that if Baghdad satisfied the benchmark tests, a second phase would begin in which the actual disarmament would take place.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in