Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

OJ plea outrages lawyer

Edward Helmore
Friday 22 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EDWARD HELMORE

Los Angeles

Moments before both sides in OJ Simpson trial rested their cases yesterday, Mr Simpson himself made a surprise statement to the court. It was not made in the jury's presence, and the prosecution lawyer, Marcia Clark, complained it was tantamount to taking the stand without cross-examination.

In his first words since he declared himself to be not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman over a year ago, Mr Simpson, who waived his right to testify, said: "I have confidence, a lot more it seems than Miss Clark has, of [the jury's] integrity and that they will find as the record stands now, that I did not, could not and would not have committed this ... crime."

His statement outraged relatives of the two victims. Judge Lance Ito then instructed the jury on how they will be able to rule when they deliberate after closing arguments next week.

In the biggest setback to the defence the jury will be able to find Simpson guilty of second-degree murder - an instruction Mr Simpson's lawyers have opposed because it will be easier for the jury to convict.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in