North Korea fuels frontier war fears
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The 43-year-old military stand-off between North and South Korea grew more tense yesterday after the Communist North renounced its obligations in the demilitarised zone, which has separated the two armies since the Korean War ended in 1953.
South Korea warned it would retaliate against any military provocation following the announcement. After a meeting of security ministers, a defence ministry official said Seoul would not tolerate violations of the truce that ended the war.
A statement broadcast from Pyongyang announced the Korean People's Army, whose 1 million troops are massed close to the border, would "give up its duty, under the armistice agreement, concerning the maintenance and control of the military demarcation line and DMZ. Secondly, the KPA side shall ... have its personnel and vehicles bear no distinctive insignia and marking when they enter the joint security area".
The consequences are notclear but in the short term it may make little difference. The armistice, which ended the three-year war, has becomemeaningless over the last few years, with both sides accusing each another of violations. The Military Armistice Council, the bilateral body responsible for monitoring the peace, has not met since 1994, when the North withdrew its mission.
But yesterday's announcement will fuel anxiety about the intentions of Pyongyang at a troubled moment in the North's history. Apart from uncertainties about the grip on power of its reclusive "Dear Leader", Kim Jong Il, parts of the country are on the verge of famine since disastrous floods last summer ruined the rice harvest.
In December, the KPA moved bombers close to the DMZ, which is only 50km from the South Korean capital, Seoul. Since the war ended no formal peace treaty has been signed. The armistice was a military ceasefire signed by generals and without it the two sides would technically be at war again.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments