Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Neighbours who kill 'without hatred': Hutus and Tutsis deny the depth of their hostility, writes Richard Dowden

Richard Dowden
Sunday 10 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GENOCIDE of Hutu and Tutsi is not something that the people of Rwandi and Burundi discuss easily. When you ask about it the first reaction is shame and a reluctance to talk about it. And those who are willing to discuss it cannot explain why it happens. They tend to tell you how well the two groups were getting on together and they will not admit to ethnic hatred. If this impression is a true one it means that the killings were carried out - neighbour against neighbour - without hatred but with some inexplicable fatalistic acceptance that it had to be done.

The traditional explanation of the difference between these two groups is that the Hutu, the Bantu-speaking farmers, lived there first but were conquered by the Tutsi, Hamatic cattle-keepers who came from the north about 400 years ago. The Tutsi then formed a permanent and separate aristocracy and kept the Hutu as serfs and underlings. Some anthropologists these days argue that the process was not achieved by foreign conquest but emerged from within the society. Today the two groups, easily distinguishable in their stereotypes, have become inextricably bound up in a hierarchical social system.

When the two kingdoms were taken over by Germany at the end of the last century and then turned over to Belgium as protectorates after the First World War, the imperial rulers reinforced the existing social system. Tutsi chiefdoms were maintained and Tutsis given preference in education and advancement. At independence the Tutsi aristocracy turned into an elite. In both Rwanda and Burundi the Hutu outnumber the Tutsi by about six to one.

They are among Africa's smallest countries and two of the poorest but they are also the most densely populated, the steep rolling hills cultivated from top to bottom in small subsistence plots of maize and bananas. The two ethnic groups live on the same hillsides and are no longer distinguishable by wealth or status. They speak the same language, Kirundu, and share the same culture. There have been increasing instances of inter-marriage though the children always belong to the ethnic group of the father. Many people had come to believe that the pathological rivalry between the two ethnic groups was a thing of the past.

In Burundi, the Tutsis maintained their power and status until last year, but in Rwanda the Hutus took power soon after independence. Hundreds of thousands of Tutsis were driven out following massacres and those that remained were subjected to discrimination. Rwandese must carry identity cards which bear their ethnic group and there have been numerous instances of Tutsi children being shunned or humiliated in schools and many cases of adults being refused jobs or houses.

In 1990, the Tutsi exiles in Uganda formed the Rwanda Patriotic Front and launched an invasion. Out of this came the coalition government of President Juvenal Habyarimana, a dictator for 20 years past: his death last week triggered the current killings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in