Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US airstrike on Syria mosque that killed nearly 40 was 'likely unlawful', finds human rights watchdog

Report details failure by authorities to take 'adequate precautions' to avoid civilian casualties

Lucy Pasha-Robinson
Wednesday 19 April 2017 03:06 EDT
Comments
Aerial photograph shows damage inflicted in the bombing
Aerial photograph shows damage inflicted in the bombing (US Department of Defense)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A US air strike on a Syrian mosque that left nearly 40 people dead was “likely unlawful”, a damning new report by Human Rights Watch has found.

“Adequate precautions” to avoid civilian casualties were not taken by American authorities before they dropped two bombs in western Aleppo on 16 March, it says.

The 16-page report found officials were unaware the building was a mosque where evening prayer was about to begin, although proper analysis could have established this.

“The US seems to have gotten several things fundamentally wrong in this attack, and dozens of civilians paid the price,” said Human Rights Watch’s deputy emergencies director Ole Solvang.

“The US authorities need to figure out what went wrong, start doing their homework before they launch attacks, and make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

US officials said the strike was targeting an al Qaeda meeting in a partially constructed community hall. However, Human Rights Watch found no evidence to support the allegation that armed group members were meeting.

Authorities have since said they will investigate whether civilians were caught up in the attack and whether the target hit was part of a complex owned by a mosque.

The report comes shortly after Donald Trump launched a barrage of missiles on a Syrian airbase following a suspected chemical weapons attack on civilians - representing a break from the previous administration’s foreign policy.

The US President ordered the firing of 59 Tomahawk Cruise missiles from the USS Porter and USS Rossinto the Sharyat airfield in western Homs in retaliation to the use of chemical weapons on civilians, allegedly by Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorial regime.

He later took to Twitter to say: "Congratulations to our great military men and women for representing the United States, and the world, so well in the Syria attack."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in