Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US offers blunt response to Theresa May's criticism of John Kerry over Israel

Washington says it is 'surprised' at PM's criticism as it is in line with the UK's own support for a UN resolution condemning settlement activity in the West Bank

Caroline Mortimer
Friday 30 December 2016 05:39 EST
John Kerry lays into Netanyahu for Israeli settlement-building

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Washington has hit back at Theresa May’s criticism of John Kerry's condemnation of Israel, expressing “surprise” at the UK’s response as it was at odds with their vote in favour of a UN declaration condemning increased settlement activity in the occupied territories.

Theresa May had distanced herself from Mr Kerry's comments in a move which has been interpreted as a sop to the incoming Trump administration.

Mr Kerry attacked the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the “most right-wing coalition in Israeli history” and warned that the increased building of settlements in the West Bank means “the status quo is leading towards one state and perpetual occupation”.

A No 10 spokesman said the Prime Minister did not think it was appropriate to focus solely on the issue of the settlements or use such strong words against a foreign government.

He said: “We do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally.

“The Government believes that negotiations will only succeed when they are conducted between the two parties, supported by the international community.”

But the US hit back with a statement: “We are surprised by the UK Prime Minister’s office statement given that Secretary Kerry’s remarks — which covered the full range of threats to a two state solution, including terrorism, violence, incitement and settlements — were in-line with the UK’s own longstanding policy and its vote at the United Nations last week.

“We are grateful for the strongly supportive statements in response to Secretary Kerry’s speech from across the world, including Germany, France, Canada, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and others.”

Mr Kerry accused the Israeli government of undermining attempts to produce a two-state solution and bring about a solution to the conflict, which has plagued the region for half a century.

Earlier this week, the UK backed a UN resolution condemning the continued expansion of the settlements while the US took the unusual step of abstaining rather than using its veto.

The move is seen as an attempt to reign in Israel’s settlement activity, which has increased in recent years, before the arrival of the Trump administration, which has vowed to protect and reinforce Israel’s interests.

Donald Trump has indicated that he may move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in what could be interpreted as unofficial recognition of Israel’s claim that the city is their capital.

In contrast, the Palestinians say East Jerusalem, which was captured along with the West Bank back in the 1960s, is part of territory they would want for a possible future state.

Washington has previously followed the international line that the city’s status should be determined at peace talks.

Additional reporting by agencies

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in