US ambassador to Israel could ‘live and work in Jerusalem’ while embassy remains in Tel Aviv, US official says
Sources say compromise possible on president-elect Donald Trump’s controversial campaign pledge to move US embassy to city contested by both Israelis and Palestinians
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.US officials and Israeli Foreign Ministry sources have said that the incoming US ambassador to Israel could be based in Jerusalem, while the official embassy building remains in Tel Aviv.
Incoming President-elect Donald Trump and his administration have repeatedly said that the new president intends to make good on the campaign trail promise to relocate the US Embassy to the country to Jerusalem.
Israel annexed east Jerusalem in a move not recognised by the international community in the 1967 Six Day War, and both the Israelis and Palestinians claim the city as their capital.
Almost all countries’ diplomatic missions to Israel are located in Tel Aviv. The proposed move has been strongly criticised by Palestinian Authority officials including President Mahmoud Abbas, liberal Israeli groups, and the US’ allies throughout the Arab and wider world.
Most have warned the move would be damaging to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, and could spark further violence.
On Tuesday, Israeli and American media reported that new US ambassador to the country David Friedman could be based in Jerusalem, living and working in the existing smaller US consulate there, while the official embassy complex continues to be located in Tel Aviv.
US officials speaking on condition of anonymity told CNN one option would simply be to “switch the signs” on the existing buildings, although the number of additional staff needed would mean the Jerusalem operation would have to be expanded.
The US government already owns part of a property in the west of the city that could serve as a home to a future embassy there.
Israeli TV station Channel 2 reported the same thing, citing Israeli Foreign Ministry officials, who again spoke anonymously so they could talk freely.
It is speculated that any potential move could be announced before May 24, a national holiday celebrated as Jerusalem Day’ in Israel.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments