Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trailer found in Iraq 'was bioweapons lab'

Rupert Cornwell
Wednesday 07 May 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

American and British experts have concluded that a trailer found by Allied forces three weeks ago in northern Iraq was a mobile bioweapons laboratory, a senior Pentagon official said yesterday.

"They have not found another plausible use for it," Stephen Cambone, under secretary of defence for intelligence said, confirming what appears to be the first real breakthrough in the search for Saddam Hussein's alleged, but elusive, chemical, germ, and nuclear weapons programmes.

He declined to describe the find as a "smoking gun," saying substantial further testing was needed. But the trailer was painted in military colours, on a carrier normally used for transporting tanks, while its gas recovery systems were "not necessary for legitimate biological work", Mr Cambone said.

The trailer is like the one outlined in the 5 February presentation to the UN Security Council by Colin Powell when the Secretary of State presented evidence suggesting that Baghdad had several such laboratories. The information at that time, American officials claimed, had come from a source who had helped to design the facility.

The discovery, if true, will be a relief to the Bush administration, which has come under increasing pressure not only abroad but also in the press at home and on Capitol Hill to produce proof of the unconventional weapons programmes whose existence was the very reason that was advanced for the Anglo-American invasion.

In the run-up to the war, American and British leaders claimed Saddam had chemical weapons ready for battlefield deployment in 45 minutes, and had stocks of biological arms, while Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, said Saddam had "reconstituted" his nuclear weapons programme. Later many of the important documents supporting the nuclear allegations were revealed as blatant forgeries.

Hours before Mr Cambone spoke, the White House spokes-man Ari Fleischer came under sustained questioning about the failure thus far to unearth such weapons for the first time. Mr Fleischer insisted they did exist and would be discovered in due course.

Mr Cambone said that of the list of 580 suspected sites American investigators had taken with them into Iraq, 70 had been inspected, as well as 40 other possible sites of which the US had not been aware before the war. By the end of May, some 2,000 experts would be engaged in trying to "unravel the mystery of Iraq's WMD".

The alleged mobile laboratory was discovered on 19 April at Tall-Kayf, near Mosul. It contained fermenting devices of the type used to make germ weapons but had been cleaned with a caustic material such as ammonia or bleach.

The find "has confirmed what our sources said existed. I'm sure we will discover WMD programmes as varied and extensive as the Secretary of State suggested [at the UN]."

Earlier, General William Wallace, the commander of US ground forces during the war, speculated that he thought Saddam did not use unconventional weapons against invading forces because they were too well hidden to retrieve before the fast coalition dash to Baghdad.

General Wallace attracted controversy early in the conflict when he said the unexpectedly strong resistance from Iraqi Fedayeen guerrillas was "not what we had war-gamed for." He was rebuked for that by Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defence, and is being moved to another job.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in