Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saudi bans use of its air bases to attack Iraq

Kim Sengupta,Andrew Buncombe
Wednesday 07 August 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Saudi Arabia announced yesterday it would veto the use of any of its territory for an attack on Iraq. The announcement is a severe blow to attempts by the United States and Britain to forge an international coalition against Saddam Hussein.

The public opposition by the Saudis, traditionally seen as the West's staunchest Arab ally in the region, is the latest rebuff for George Bush and Tony Blair who have found themselves increasingly isolated by European and Middle Eastern states, as well as Russia and China.

The German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder also issued his strongest warning so far against an invasion of Iraq, saying it could "destroy the international alliance against terrorism".

Because of the Saudi reticence, the United States is now planning to use Qatar as its headquarters for the air campaign in any coming war. Work has been secretly under way for months to build up an air base there in case the Saudis refused permission, as they have.

The Al Udeid base, 20 miles from the Qatari capital, Doha, is now said to be almost ready, and squadrons of American and British warplanes are expected to arrive in the near future, according to defence sources.

Saudi Arabia was the launchpad for Western forces in the Gulf War and played a crucial role in later actions against Iraq. The Prince Sultan air base is still used by American and British warplanes to patrol the southern "no-fly zone". But political and religious tension in the kingdom is now high amid a growing anti-Western feeling, fuelled by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There are also protests at the continuing presence of large groups of American forces in the land of Islam's holiest shrines.

Against that volatile backdrop, the kingdom also faces the likelihood of a power struggle within the House of Saud between conservatives and reformers because King Fahd is seriously ill in Geneva and may die.

The timing and the forthright nature of the statement, by Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Foreign Minister, is seen as highly significant. He said: "We are against any attack on Iraq because we believe it is not needed, especially now Iraq is moving to implement United Nations resolutions. For the government of Iraq, the leadership of Iraq, any change that happens there has to come from the Iraqi people."

Relations between the Saudis and Americans are at a low ebb. Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State, rang Prince Saud yesterday in a fence-mending exercise after it was revealed that a confidential Pentagon briefing had described Saudi Arabia as a funder of international terrorism, and the "kernel of evil and the most dangerous opponent" America faces in the Middle East.

The Bush administration meanwhile sent out conflicting messages. President Bush said he would be "patient" and consult Congress and the US's allies over Iraq, but Vice-President Dick Cheney stuck to the administration's hawkish stance by expressing scepticism about the value of the UN inspectors' return. Presidential aides later said it was not Mr Bush's intention to send a conciliatory message by promising to explore "all options and all tools at my disposal: diplomacy, international pressure, perhaps the military". US oil futures dipped because his remarks were taken as a sign that an offensive was some time away.

The confusion was echoed across the Atlantic, when Mike O'Brien, a Foreign Office minister, said war would be averted if Saddam Hussein readmitted arms inspectors. But that was at odds with Tony Blair who supports Mr Bush's policy of "regime change" in Baghdad.

If military action does begin, the Al Udeid base will play an important role. Defence sources say it has a 12,500ft runway, with hangars fortified against chemical and biological attacks, for up to 120 warplanes. The base has also been supplied with satellite linksthat enable the command centre to co-ordinate air strikes and download reconnaissance footage from unmanned aircraft.

The US is expected to deploy F-16 and F-15E fighter bombers at the base, as well as unmanned Predators and Global Hawks. The British contribution is likely to consist of RAF Tornado strike aircraft, TriStar and VC-10s to provide air-to-air refuelling, and Awacs, Nimrods and Canberras for reconnaissance. The Americans also have four warehouses with tanks and armour to equip a mechanised brigade at Al Udeid.

President Saddam is due to address his nation in a televised speech today as his government steps up efforts to avert a war.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in