Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saudi Arabia doesn't need elections even though Syria does, ambassador claims

Abdallah al-Mouallimi makes claims despite it being illegal to criticise the regime in the kingdom

Pete Apps
Saturday 26 March 2016 09:32 EDT
Comments
Abdallah al-Mouallimi being interviewed by Mehdi Hasan
Abdallah al-Mouallimi being interviewed by Mehdi Hasan (Al Jazeera)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Elections are unnecessary in Saudi Arabia because its people are happier with the current system of government “than almost any other country in the world”, the kingdom's UN ambassador has claimed.

Abdallah al-Mouallimi was challenged as to why the Saudis were calling for elections in Syria, but only allow limited municipal elections in their own country, where it is illegal to call for a change of government or publish criticism of the state.

Mr Al-Mouallimi, the Permanent Representative of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations, was grilled on the point in an interview for Al Jazeera by British journalist Mehdi Hasan.

Abdallah al-Mouallimi speaking at the United Nations
Abdallah al-Mouallimi speaking at the United Nations (Getty Images)

Mr Hasan asked: “If the people of Syria should get to choose their own head of state, why not the people in Saudi Arabia as well?”

Mr Al-Mouallimi responded: “Elections are not the panacea for everything. Just because there are elections in Syria doesn’t mean there have to be elections in Saudi.

“The key question is: Is the population content and happy and satisfied with the form of government they have and I would like to claim if you went to Saudi Arabia and conducted a survey… you will find a high degree of support for the system.”

Mr Hasan responded: “Isn’t that partly because they do say they want another government they will go to jail?”

Mr Al-Mouallimi denied this, claiming that even an “anonymous survey” would return support for the political system.

He added: “What is important is the pact between the government and the governed, the mutual acceptance.

“I can tell you that mutual acceptance is much higher in Saudi Arabia than almost any other country in the world.”

Municipal elections were held in Saudi Arabia in December, with women allowed to vote for the first time in the country’s history. Representatives were elected to its “consultative assembly”, which can propose laws but does not have the power to enact them.

Political parties are banned in Saudi Arabia and the country is run by a king, who serves as head of state and absolute monarch. Calling for a change of government or removal of the monarchy is illegal, and it is a crime to publish anything which damages the state’s reputation.

Saudi Arabia is one of several countries to call for “free and fair elections” to be held in Syria.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in