Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Optimism as Middle East peace talks enter final phase

Phil Reeves
Monday 08 November 1999 19:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Undeterred by a bombing on the eve of their meeting, Israelis and Palestinians began face-to-face final peace talks with hopeful rhetoric, while refusing to budge on key issues that have divided them for years.

Undeterred by a bombing on the eve of their meeting, Israelis and Palestinians began face-to-face final peace talks with hopeful rhetoric, while refusing to budge on key issues that have divided them for years.

Both sides gathered in the West Bank town of Ramallah yesterday to try to hammer out the basis of a peace agreement, finally ending a process that has stumbled along since 1993. They were keen to appear confident that they could meet an extremely optimistic time-table in which a final deal is to be signed by September next year. "It is a long road we have to cover in a very short time, but with a joint effort we can make it," said the Israeli chief negotiator, Oded Eran.

His Palestinian counterpart, Yasser Abed Rabbo - a former guerrilla fighter who has frequently been scaldingly critical of the Israelis - agreed, praising the "open and frank atmosphere" of the first 75-minute session, which was largely about setting an agenda.

But there was no escaping the scale of their task. Mr Eran is entering the process armed with four Israeli "red lines" - no return to the pre-1967 borders, control over most Jewish settlements on the West Bank and all of Jerusalem, and no "foreign army" west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians reiterated their demand for Israeli withdrawal from all territory seized in the 1967 war, citing UN Resolution 242 - which the Israelis argue does not apply to the West Bank or Jerusalem (where the Palestinians want to establish a capital in the city's Arab east). "Withdrawal to the 4 June 1967 borders is an absolute requirement for peace," said Mr Abed Rabbo. "Without it our efforts will amount to no more than the deferral of crisis."

The meeting's schedule was unaltered by Sunday's bombing, which injured 33 people in Netanya, north of Tel Aviv. No group has claimed responsibility, but Israeli police no longer believe the Islamic group, Hamas, was behind it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in