Judge hails 'guarantee' of women MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The draft charter contains a guarantee that women will make up no less than 25 per cent of MPs in the future Iraqi parliament, Zakia Hakki said.
"This is good news, it has been a real battle," said Ms Hakki, who was the first woman judge appointed in Iraq in 1959. The text, agreed by the drafting committee, speaks of "the goal of aiming for 25 per cent of female members in the National Assembly".
Ms Hakki said the result was a tribute to the work of women's groups and other non-governmental organisations who campaigned for women's representation to be recognised. "People came from different ethnic backgrounds but we unified all our efforts, and this was a victory for us."
Ms Hakki, an MP who is a Kurd and a Shia Muslim, saidfrom Baghdad that the drafting committee had dropped any conditions attached to the issue of women's representation.
"They had initially said it would only be for two terms, which meant that after eight years the guarantee could be removed. But now it is without any conditions."
But Iraqi women are still waiting to see a copy of the text to confirm the role of Islam. It appears that the final draft speaks of Islam as "a main source" of law, rather than "the main source" which had been feared by women's groups.
"This will affect all our laws, including the criminal courts," she said. "If the constitution says 'a main source', it's better. We still have such things as the universal declaration of human rights as a reference."
The issue of the Islamic veil was trickier, she added. "We need time for that. It's not like a button you press, and say 'you shouldn't have this'. It's not a matter of issuing a law about it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments