Order! Order! Jordanian MPs fight in parliamentary session live-streamed on TV
Constitutional reforms have sparked controversy with some MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A session of parliament in Jordan descended into a fistfight between MPs, and the altercation was live-streamed on local television.
The brawl broke out during a discussion on constitutional reforms, which saw the chamber debate adding the Arabic female noun for Jordanian citizens into the constitution’s section on equal rights.
The amendment has been referred to by some MPs as “useless”.
The video shows the chamber descend into chaos, as the lawmakers first shout at each other then resort to fighting.
A row between Deputy Suleiman Abu Yahya and parliament House Speaker Abdul Karim Dughmi erupted, after when Yahya accused Dughmi of being “unable to run the show” and claimed he knew “nothing”. The heated debate was broadcasted live on the television channel Al-Mamlaka.
During the clip, one of the deputies fell to the ground, and the session was halted. It has now been adjourned until Wednesday.
The constitutional reforms have sparked controversy with some lawmakers objecting to what they see as an increase in the monarch’s autocratic powers.
While Jordan is a constitutional monarchy, its hereditary ruler, King Abdullah II, has extensive powers, which has led to some critics arguing that its democratic institutions are not able to provide meaningful checks and balances.
US advocacy group Freedom House downgraded Jordan from “partly free” to “not free” this year.
Earlier this year, there were reports of an attempted coup involving members of the Jordanian royal family.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments