Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Iraqi opposition leaders warn US and Britain not to invade

Kim Sengupta
Sunday 14 July 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Iraqi exiles expected to participate in a future government of their country warned yesterday that an invasion by American and British troops would bring widespread destruction without removing Saddam Hussein.

Opposition leaders stressed that a large-scale offensive by Washington and its allies would not be supported by opponents of the Baghdad regime, either inside or outside Iraq.

In response to repeated reports of the Bush administration preparing for war, with a 250,000-strong force, a number of prominent Iraqi defectors insisted that more focused, specialist strikes would have far more chance of success.

In London, where more than 300 opposition military and political leaders are taking part in the first conference of its kind, delegates said large-scale Western attacks on Iraq were unnecessary because most Iraqi forces would turn against President Saddam at the outbreak of hostilities.

A former major-general, Najib al-Salhi, said: "The United States will not find support inside or outside Iraq for an offensive that would harm civilians, destroy infrastructure, and target troops not defending the regime.

"Any campaign must be limited to toppling Saddam. The army will not defend him and neither will the Republican Guard [elite troops thought to be loyal to the Iraqi leader]."

In Kuwait, a former Iraqi intelligence chief also warned Washington that a land war could leave a desperate Iraqi regime with no option but to use weapons of mass destruction. Wafiq al-Samarrai said: "The US should know that Saddam will not hesitate to use weapons of mass destruction on American military groupings. Diplomacy is the only choice for the United States."

Mr Samarrai, who is close to Ahmad Chalabi, the leader of the exiled Iraqi National Congress – seen by some in Washington as a possible post-Saddam leader – added: "If that fails then another option is an intelligence operation that targets the regime only.

"Efforts must focus on core issues to topple the Iraqi regime by choosing the best, quickest, and least costly method for the Iraqi people and regional states ... carrying out a swift intelligence operation."

The opposition leaders are also concerned that the US and Britain may incite Iraqis to rise against President Saddam and then fail to help, as happened at the end of the Gulf War.

Another former major-general, Tawfiq al-Yassiri, who led an uprising in southern Iraq at that time, and was wounded when Iraqi forces crushed the rebels, is among senior officers counselling caution to compatriots inside Iraq. They point out that it was the US President's father, George Bush Snr, who abandoned the rebels, and that some members of his administration were back in power in Washington.

The appearance at the conference of Prince Hassan of Jordan, an uncle of King Abdullah, increased speculation over the likelihood of war. Leaked Pentagon reports have stated that Jordan has agreed to become one of the bases for a US attack. This, however, has been denied by the king.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in