Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump administration most ‘spiteful’ to Iran in 40 years, says President Rouhani

Washington insists 'regime change' is not its policy

Andrew Buncombe
Washington DC
Sunday 14 October 2018 10:25 EDT
Comments
(Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Trump administration’s approach to Iran is the most “spiteful” of any US government in 40 years, Iranian president Hassan Rouhani has claimed.

Insisting the US wanted regime change in Iran despite Washington’s repeated denials, he said America was using psychological and economic warfare to try and destroy the Islamic Republic.

“In the past 40 years there has not been a more spiteful team than the current US government team towards Iran, Iranians and the Islamic Republic,” Mr Rouhani said in a speech broadcast on state television.

According to Reuters, Mr Rouhani, delivering a speech to mark the start of the academic year at Tehran University, added: “There was a time when there was one person who had enmity. The rest were moderate. Now…the worst have gathered around each other.”

The US this spring started reimposing sanctions on Iran that were frozen in 2015, after Mr Trump’s announcement he was withdrawing from the eight-party Iran nuclear deal, agreed by Barack Obama

It started by reintroducing steps against Iran’s currency trade, metals and auto sectors in August. Sanctions against Iran’s crucial oil industry are due to come into force next month.

White House national security adviser John Bolton: 'Iran is a rogue regime. It has been a threat throughout the Middle East.'

The US has been threatening financial sanctions against other countries that try and continue to trade with Iran. This summer, the US also stepped up its propaganda war, by highlighting issues such as the limits to women’s rights in the country, while remaining silent about the situation in nations such as Saudi Arabia, which is considered an ally.

Part of the campaign involved a series of speeches and online communications meant to foment unrest and help pressure Iran to end its nuclear programme and its support of militant groups.

Before joining the administration as Mr Trump’s national security advisor, John Bolton openly campaigned for a change of government in Iran. He and the US government insist “regime change” is not Washington’s official policy, but that it wants the Iranian government to alter its behaviour.

Speaking to reporters last month, Mr Bolton said there would be “hell to pay” if Iran harmed the US, its allies or its own citizens.

“As I have said repeatedly, regime change in Iran is not the administration’s policy. We’ve imposed very stringent sanctions on Iran, more are coming, and what we expect from Iran is massive changes in their behaviour.”

He added: “And until that happens we will continue to exert what the president has called maximum pressure.”

On Sunday, Mr Rouhani said the US government was trying to undermine Iran’s legitimacy.

“Reducing the legitimacy of the system is their final goal. When they say getting rid of, regime change in their own words, how does regime change happen,” he said. “Through reducing legitimacy, otherwise a regime doesn’t change.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in